Home Conservation The Pacific Must Continue Leading the Charge on International Court Decision on...

The Pacific Must Continue Leading the Charge on International Court Decision on Climate Change

Pacific Youth in support of the ICJAO campaign. [Credit: Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change]
Sponsored Advertisement

By: Cynthia Houniuhi – President, Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change Vishal Prasad – Campaign Director, Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change

Let it not be said that Pacific Island countries don’t ‘punch above their weight’ on the international scene. We may be small island countries, but on everything from nuclear weapons to combating climate change we are at the forefront of global leadership.

1MORE REASONS 190x135 A V2

We are the quiet achievers, using the Pacific way to win over allies and sceptics to push an agenda that is good for the Pacific. And we know what is good for the Pacific is good for the world.

Our Pacific family is united that the climate crisis is our biggest existential threat. We are already feeling the effects of a warming world, through extreme weather and sea level rise. If the world fails to reduce emissions in line with the science, it is our people, our environment and our culture that are at the most risk. Climate change is causing a human rights crisis for us.

But we are not only the most vulnerable but the most active. We are putting our money where our mouth is. While richer countries continue to dig up, use and export planet killing fossil fuels, the Pacific is moving to a fossil fuel free future. The Port Vila Call for a Just Transition to a Fossil Fuel Free Pacific is an exciting initiative, led by Vanuatu, Tuvalu, Tonga, Fiji, Niue, and the Solomon Islands. Countries like the Marshall Islands and

Solomon Islands are at the forefront of decarbonising global shipping, pushing the agenda at global meetings.

And let us not forget the spectacular diplomatic victory by the Pacific in securing a United Nations General Assembly Resolution earlier this year. The global community unanimously adopted Vanuatu’s Resolution calling the International Court of Justice to issue an advisory opinion on the obligations of States with respect to climate change. It has been inspiring to watch an idea born in a humble classroom in Vanuatu travel throughout the Pacific, all the way to New York where 130 countries co-sponsored and now to the court’s home in the Netherlands.

I’m encouraged by the support our Pacific family for the ICJ, not only for their vote at the UN but the work they undertook to lobby countries around the world to support it by consensus.

But the Pacific cannot rest on its laurels. If solving the climate crisis was easy, it would be done already. With the International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion, our job is not done. We need to continue to push the agenda.

Pacific Governments must be at the forefront of ensuring the International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion fulfils its potential. The current situation is that states recognise they have an obligation to mitigate climate change, redress vulnerable countries that are already suffering and ensure that everyone is able to adapt to the climate crisis. But there has been a consistent failure from particularly high polluting countries to take the action needed.

The recent Pacific Islands Forum meeting in Rarotonga, Cook Islands reaffirmed this, with leaders strongly encouraging the participation of all Forum Members in the advisory proceedings of the ICJ, in particular by developing progressive and comprehensive national written submission to the court.

A legal opinion that reinforces the obligations of those states under international law could change all that. But that is not a foregone conclusion. We must continue to work. The International Court of Justice is currently receiving submissions from Governments that will inform their work. It is crucial that all Pacific Governments prioritise making submissions to the court, highlighting the impacts climate change is having on our countries, people and our region.

It is up to us to articulate that countries that continue to export and use fossil fuels, especially rich countries that have caused the bulk of the world’s carbon pollution, have to face legal consequences for their actions, including compensation, loss and damage payments and provision of climate finance to help us adapt.

It is our unique perspective that will ensure the opinion has the lasting legal effect needed to stop the climate crisis in its tracks.

Learn more about the ICJAO campaign on www.pisfcc.org

What you think?

Sponsored Advertisement
Solomon Water